Frederik Nielsen vs Matic Dimic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nielsen vs Dimic analysis and find out who is favored!
Frederik Nielsen vs Matic Dimic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nielsen 1 - 0 Dimic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nielsen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Dimic has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nielsen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dimic has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nielsen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dimic has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nielsen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Dimic winning 53.57% (W/L 15/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nielsen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 186/ 110), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47). Dimic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 47/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nielsen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nielsen winning 2 and Dimic winning 0. The last match between Nielsen and Dimic was at the Portoroz Challenger, 04-08-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Frederik Nielsen getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nielsen and Dimic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nielsen winning 0 times and Dimic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nielsen winning 0, and Dimic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nielsen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Dimic has played against players with an average rank of 55.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nielsen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dimic has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nielsen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dimic has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
13
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
13
Minor
Ret.
Rank
190
High
40
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (560-365)
Career Total W/L
50% (66-66)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$69,005
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Frederik Nielsen | Matic Dimic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:8:52 | 1:8:52 |
1st Serve % | 57% (32/56) | 63% (44/70) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (23/32) | 52% (23/44) |
2nd Serve Win% | 67% (16/24) | 46% (12/26) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 50% (35/70) | 30% (17/56) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-0 |
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Matic Dimic
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Frederik Nielsen | Matic Dimic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Frederik Nielsen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Frederik Nielsen
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Rubber 4 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Go Soeda
Player
Frederik Nielsen
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Peter Polansky
Player
Frederik Nielsen
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Fabrice Martin
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Frederik Nielsen
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kevin King
Player
Frederik Nielsen
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
57%
(
65 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
49 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Matic Dimic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Louis Wessels
Player
Matic Dimic
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matic Dimic
Player
Adam Jones
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Abdulhamid Mubarak
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Matic Dimic
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matic Dimic
Player
Julian Desousa
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Moritz Schroeter
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Bor Artnak
Player
Matic Dimic
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Boris Butulija
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Ammar Elamin
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matic Dimic
Player
Luciano Barbarino
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more